west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Mendelian randomization study" 3 results
  • Resistin and multiple myeloma: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

    Objective To investigate the causal relationship between resistin and multiple myeloma (MM). Methods A two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis was conducted using genetic variants (SNPs) associated with resistin as instrumental variables and MM genome-wide association study (GWAS) data as the outcome event. Five analysis methods, including inverse-variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted model, and simple model were used to assess the causal impact of resistin on the risk of MM. Results None of the five analysis methods showed a causal relationship between resistin and multiple myeloma (P>0.05). Sensitivity analysis indicated consistent and robust results, with no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy, heterogeneity, outliers, or individual SNPs influencing the findings. Conclusion This Mendelian randomization study provides no support for a causal relationship between resistin and the risk of multiple myeloma.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Causal relationship between asthma and gastroesophageal reflux disease based on two-sample Mendelian randomization

    Objective To evaluate the potential causal relationship between asthma and the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) using a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Methods A large sample of genome-wide association study was used to summarize the data, and the genetic loci [single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)] closely related to asthma were selected as instrumental variables, and Mendelian randomization analysis was conducted by inverse variance weighting, weighted median and MR-Egger method, respectively. At the same time, the multi-effect of MR-Egger was detected and the sensitivity analysis was carried out by Leave-one-out method to ensure the robustness of the results. Results A total of 77 SNPs closely related to asthma were selected as instrumental variables. The results of inverse variance weighted analysis showed a significant positive correlation between asthma and the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease [odds ratio (OR)=1.044, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.006, 1.083), P=0.024]. Weighted median results showed similar causality [OR=1.075, 95%CI (1.021, 1.133), P=0.006]. The MR-Egger regression results showed that there was a positive correlation between asthma and GERD, but there was no statistical significance [OR=1.080, 95%CI (0.983, 1.187), P=0.115]. The heterogeneity test results showed that there was no heterogeneity in the causal relationship between asthma and GERD (P>0.05). The results of the horizontal pleiotropy test showed that there was no horizontal pleiotropy in SNPs (P>0.05). The results of the retention test showed that no SNPs with significant impact on the results were detected. Conclusion There is a positive causal relationship between asthma and GERD.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Causal relationship between intestinal flora and esophageal cancer: A Mendelian randomization analysis

    ObjectiveTo explore whether there is a causal relationship between intestinal flora and esophageal cancer. MethodsSummary statistics of intestinal flora and esophageal cancer were obtained from the genome-wide association study (GWAS) database. Five methods, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median estimation, Mendelian randomization (MR)-Egger regression, single mode, and weighted mode, were used for analysis, with IVW as the main analysis method. Sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate the reliability of MR results. ResultsIn the IVW method, Oxalobacteraceae [OR=1.001, 95%CI (1.000, 1.002), P=0.023], Faecalibacterium [OR=1.001, 95%CI (1.000, 1.002), P=0.028], Senecionis [OR=1.002, 95%CI (1.000, 1.003), P=0.006] and Veillonella [OR=1.001, 95%CI (1.000, 1.002), P=0.018] were positively correlated with esophageal cancer, while Burkholderiales [OR=0.999, 95%CI (0.998, 1.001), P=0.002], Bacteroides oxidizes [OR=0.998, 95%CI (0.997, 0.999), P=0.038], Romboutsia [OR=0.999, 95%CI (0.998, 1.000), P=0.048] and Schleiferi [OR=0.998, 95%CI (0.997, 0.999), P=0.013] were negatively correlated with esophageal cancer. Sensitivity analysis showed no evidence of heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy and reverse causality. ConclusionOxalobacteraceae, Faecalibacterium, Senecionis and Veillonella increase the risk of esophageal cancer, while Burkholderiales, Bacteroides oxidizes, Romboutsia and Schleiferi decrease the risk of esophageal cancer. Further studies are needed to explore how these bacteria affect the progression of esophageal cancer.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content